An inventory nobody could vouch for.
The asset list lived in spreadsheets, maintained by hand, and drifted from reality with every deployment.
Dev, staging, and vendor-created systems accumulated outside change control — invisible to the team, visible to attackers.
When an exposure was found, no one owned it end to end — findings stalled between infrastructure, application, and security teams.
Headquarters expected regular, defensible risk reporting — and technical severity lists were not an answer the board could act on.
One seed domain in. A defensible risk picture out.
From one registered domain, five AI modules and 10+ intelligence sources mapped the full external surface — including assets no inventory listed.
Two independent AI passes stripped false positives, so the team triaged only exposures that were actually exploitable.
Every validated exposure was converted to expected loss in dollars, producing a fix order that survives a budget meeting.
Reports shipped in English and Korean, so the local team and headquarters read the same evidence — no translation lag, no lost nuance.
Three months later, three things changed.
They went beyond listing assets — they singled out the vulnerabilities most likely to be exploited, with concrete guidance and re-verification after the fix.
One seed domain in — discovery, dual-AI validation, and FAIR quantification out.
Explore EASM →Threat-actor context and PoC-verified findings behind the priorities.
Explore CTI →